Elementary-level teacher preparation programs could use a significant overhaul in the area of mathematics, according to a new report from the National Council on Teacher Quality: Many leave educators ill-equipped to teach critical topics — and children not up to the task in a difficult subject.
The report looks at several areas NCTQ identified as essential to strengthening instruction and rates states on how well they hit those markers.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
It found, for example, only 21 states provide clear, detailed guidance to teacher preparation programs about what they should teach in regard to numbers and operations, algebraic thinking, geometry and measurement, and data analysis and probability — topics the group found, based on research, critical to teachers’ and students’ success.
Twenty-four states do not offer recommendations for curricula. (National Council on Teacher Quality)
And 24 states offer no recommendation as to which materials districts should be using in the classroom, a missed opportunity to suggest the best possible curricula for young children, NCTQ found.
“We know how important strong math skills are for students: They add up to better reading scores and they’re a signal of stronger college readiness,” said NCTQ President Heather Peske. “We found that across the country, states can do much more to better prepare elementary teachers to teach math.”
Study: Math Scores Matter More for Adult Earnings Than Reading, Health Factors
U.S. students’ ongoing struggles with math proficiency have sparked multiple examinations of how math is taught throughout K-12 and what needs to change to bring about improvement. The most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress, released in January and often referred to as the Nation’s Report Card, showed math scores were flat for eighth graders and up slightly for fourth graders, but those gains went mostly to high achievers.
In the NCTQ report, Alabama is a notable exception in its approach, making improvements to math instruction on multiple fronts, including in teacher training programs and the use of high-quality instructional materials.
Eric Mackey (Alabama State Department of Education)
State Superintendent Eric G. Mackey said the effort began roughly seven years ago, starting with the development of new standards — followed by new assessments. After that came a coaching pilot program that was so successful, he said, it will be available in every K-5 school within just a few years.
Mackey said the effort around finding stellar curricula proved challenging: It took the state two years to develop the first list.
“But it wasn’t good enough,” he said. “So, we did a second and third round of vetting and got it down to a pretty tight group.”
Alabama also updated all of its standards around teacher training and added a new master’s degree, that of an elementary math specialist, he said. Some of the efforts seemed to pay off: Fourth-grade Alabama NAEP scores rose six points between 2022 and 2024 and were just a single point below the national average.
But the state still struggles with older students: 8th-grade scores dropped by two points in that timeframe and were 10 points below the national average.
“We are limited on funds,” Mackey said. “Our strategy is to get it right in elementary school and then maintain that through middle school.”
Which States Have the Fastest-Growing Achievement Gaps in 8th-Grade Math?
NCTQ notes that while states have the authority to set the standards for teacher preparation programs, 16 outsource that job, often to national organizations that don’t always focus on the teaching of mathematics.
And, their analysis found, many states don’t require teacher prep programs to address the knowledge and skills teachers need to teach math concepts, despite the long-recognized benefits to students.
NCTQ also found fault with many of the 30 elementary math licensure tests used across the country: 31 states offer “unacceptable” or “weak” licensure tests, it found.
Iowa and Maine have none at all.
Only 10 such tests were “acceptable” by NCTQ: All paid adequate attention to numbers and operations, algebraic thinking, geometry and measurement and data analysis and probability. Thirteen states — Alabama, Connecticut and Texas among them — require a “strong” and “acceptable” test for all elementary math teacher candidates.
Only six tests were deemed “strong” and are used exclusively in five states: Texas, Kansas, Missouri, Alabama and New York..
Of the 17 weak tests, five address less than half of the subtopics in one or more areas and all combine math with one or more other subjects.
Three tests were deemed “unacceptable” because they omit one or more math content topic areas — but they are used in nine states: Michigan, Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota and West Virginia.
And, NCTQ found, just 21 states make the passing rates on their elementary math licensure test public, making it difficult to identify those that have failed to offer robust programs.
Like other studies before it, NCTQ notes the importance of high-quality instructional materials, curriculum aligned with college- and career-ready standards: Such tools have great potential in improving student performance. Despite these benefits, only four states require their use, including Rhode Island.
State law requires the state education department to identify at least five high-quality curricula that align with state standards. Rhode Island districts must implement one of them, though the plan does allow for some flexibility: Districts can apply for a waiver if at least three-quarters of students meet state assessment goals — and no student subgroups need targeted help.
Like Alabama, many states find their academic goals constrained by limited budgets. Just 24 states provide funding for math curriculum materials and only two — South Carolina and Tennessee — provide funding for this purpose and require schools to select materials from an approved list, NCTQ found.
The report also touts the importance of professional development for math teachers, noting that nearly 60% of the potential impact of adopting high-quality curricula depends on teachers improving their instructional practices.
Improving Math Proficiency Starts With Us, the Educators
“We know the importance of professional learning,” Peske said. “It goes hand in hand with the adoption of high-quality instructional materials.”
The group said only six states financially support math coaches/specialists in K-12 schools, and just four — Alabama, California, Georgia and Michigan — provide funding for both professional learning and coaching.
Louisiana schools have used high-quality instructional materials for math and English language arts for more than a decade, but it wasn’t enough to improve student achievement, State Superintendent of Education Cade Brumley said.
Cade Brumley, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education. (Louisiana State Superintendent of Education)
The state now requires all fourth- through eighth-grade math teachers to complete a 50-hour numeracy course — teachers in younger grades will soon have to meet a similar requirement — and while districts are free to select their own curriculum, the state created a rating system that has encouraged many to pick what it considers the best offerings.
Louisiana also invested $100 million in tutoring programs in recent years. It has already seen a difference in student performance.
“We have made really good progress,” Brumley said. “But what happens in Louisiana is the same as what happens across the country: As students matriculate from 4th to 8th grade, academic performance declines. Our intent is to be the first state to correct that issue in math.
“We are also refreshing our math standards with great emphasis on foundational math skills in the early grades,” he added. “We talk about fluent readers but we don’t talk enough about fluent mathematicians — and that needs to change.”